Main Menu

News:

If you are having problems registering, please e-mail theconclaveforum at gmail.com

Untouchables

Started by Shroud, November 18, 2012, 12:53:51 AM

Previous topic - Next topic

CantStrafeRight

Quote from: Dwi on November 18, 2012, 10:02:32 PM
Quote from: Charax on November 18, 2012, 07:28:14 PM
God I hate Bequin. Nothing about her makes a lick of goddamn sense

Heh. Then You may hate the new Bequin more considering shes the real Bequin's clone daughter/twin/thingy.

I still liked the new book though.

Did you just spoil the plot of the book?

I've not found time to read it yet and have been trying my best to stay away from spoilers.  oh well.

Dwi

Hell no! The polts wierder than that. Hell I'm not even sure I know what the plot is...

Her colne state is really only a foot note in the book for about two pages of nearly no relavence to the story IMO
May The Emperor protect us from the dakness of the void. That or we can run around in little cricles and wave our arms and shout

Shroud

I like Marco's idea of the negative effects of untouchables on their allies. However i do not think that Untouchables should have any active abilities as a result of their blankness, in all the background which I have read, all their abilities are Passive (yes even the soul draining).

Koval

Quote from: Dwi on November 19, 2012, 01:00:06 AM
To defend Abnet a bit cloneing tech dose exist in 40k. Now to throw him under the buss he dosent't explain it.

*Sigh*
Oh, we've got the Krieg and certain Storm Trooper regiments if you want cloning tech (not to mention a huge number of servitors), so that one doesn't need explaining. The problem is... well, Bequin.